Comments on: Thanks-but-Ill-do-the-personalising-myself-if-you-dont-mind-ta-very-much.gov.uk http://idealgovernment.com/2008/07/thanks_but_ill_do_the_personalising_myself_if_you_dont_mind_ta_very_muchgov/ What do we want from Internet-age government? Wouldn't it be better if... Wed, 14 May 2014 08:35:11 +0000 hourly 1 By: boediger http://idealgovernment.com/2008/07/thanks_but_ill_do_the_personalising_myself_if_you_dont_mind_ta_very_muchgov/comment-page-1/#comment-2444 Thu, 26 Feb 2009 23:42:35 +0000 http://thanks_but_ill_do_the_personalising_myself_if_you_dont_mind_ta_very_muchgov#comment-2444 Does that work? Power of Info is not meant to be about government-held personal data, and accordingly this assumes the personal data is held and processed by the user. Glad of comments.

boediger

]]>
By: Ben http://idealgovernment.com/2008/07/thanks_but_ill_do_the_personalising_myself_if_you_dont_mind_ta_very_muchgov/comment-page-1/#comment-2443 Sun, 13 Jul 2008 01:30:20 +0000 http://thanks_but_ill_do_the_personalising_myself_if_you_dont_mind_ta_very_muchgov#comment-2443 It’s a nice idea, but unfortunately the ‘DWP rules engine’ (if such a thing exists) will be next to useless if the quality of day to day decision-making is anything to go by.

The benefit system is *so* complex, with significant amounts of benefits being awarded on a subjective rather than objective basis, that the results of user initiated queries would either be slanted towards the negative interpretation of circumstances(for instance, not including an award of Disability Living Allowance) which would restrict peoples ability to make informed decisions, or would have a positive slant which could be just as dangerous, encouraging people to make life changing decisions, which could turn out to be financially unsustainable once a real-life decision maker has decided to refuse a certain benefit.

]]>
By: Ian Brown http://idealgovernment.com/2008/07/thanks_but_ill_do_the_personalising_myself_if_you_dont_mind_ta_very_muchgov/comment-page-1/#comment-2442 Fri, 11 Jul 2008 12:04:35 +0000 http://thanks_but_ill_do_the_personalising_myself_if_you_dont_mind_ta_very_muchgov#comment-2442 Where do I sign up 🙂

I think on a privacy v computation v bandwidth trade-off, it would almost always make more sense to execute the rules locally than via a remote API. The guvmint could even multicast rules and updates to save further bandwidth.

]]>
By: Jim T http://idealgovernment.com/2008/07/thanks_but_ill_do_the_personalising_myself_if_you_dont_mind_ta_very_muchgov/comment-page-1/#comment-2441 Thu, 10 Jul 2008 16:04:37 +0000 http://thanks_but_ill_do_the_personalising_myself_if_you_dont_mind_ta_very_muchgov#comment-2441 This definitely works for me. One note: although it would be better if the rules could be downloaded, maybe an open anonymous remote API(web service, etc) for each section would work as well?

For example, rather than get the tax computation rules, submit the minimum tax data into the gov’s real algorithm and get the result. I’m not talking about having a website where the user has to type in their name, address, job details, etc, but exposing the core API that would be used to calculate the tax anyway. This could be used by your application which makes multiple requests to the back-ends and produces a combined overview of your situation.

]]>