25 Oct 2008

Befuddled Westminster Council: to destroy or not to destroy?

The Indy has a marvellous story about Westminster Council trying to dispel the spirit of Banksy with those rational groupthink-brainspeak values which are the currency of local government. What makes it so delightful is the surprising way in which the value of “art” has put the money on Banksy’s side of the debate.

So they’re really going to destroy a £300,000 artwork to improve the environment, just to prove their grey prejudices about graffiti? But it’s a £300,000 artwork. It proves their prejudices about graffiti are wrong.

This story needs the destruction of the work to fulfil its potential power. Only thus does it make its statement about the state. The work isn’t half as powerful if councils liked them and preserved them. But when they destroy them, their artistic value goes up. And after all, the image persists in the media. Thus Banksy wins. (Cheers Suw, btw, for being the first to put me on to Banksy when ORG first started). 

 
Page 1 of 1 pages

Ideal Government

Let's say what we want from e-enabled government. Let's observe government first-hand. Let's say "Wouldn't It Be Better If" (WIBBI). Become an ethnographer of bureaucracy today! It beats getting frustrated with public services.

Categories

Comment

Anyone is free to comment. Or mail with an article if you want to be an author. I'll post it up and send you a password. This whole thing is supported by Kable.

Authors

Member List

Sign up for new articles

Locations of visitors to this page

Copyright

Creative Commons License - Some Rights Reserved Protect your Bits. Support ORG. Open Rights Group

Designed by...

visit ScoreCommunications Ltd

Statistics

This page has been viewed 1631919 times

Entries: 1714 | Comments: 2785 | Trackbacks: 206
Most Recent Entry: 01/02/2009 12:43 pm
Most Recent Comment: 01/02/2009 04:11 pm

Members: 185 | Logged in: 0 | Guests: 22
Most recent visitor: 01/07/2009 04:10 am
Most visitors ever: 443 on 10/12/2005 02:21 pm