Does government take evidence seriously, asks CST

Generally I’d vote for anyone who delivers the conditions for peace and low taxes. But last year I decided three “indicator” policies for when I vote next election:

1. an ID/e-gov policy which reflects an agenda of respect for British people
2. a drugs policy less expensive and harmful than the present one
3. a cheaper and more effective public sector

For those you need rational political decisions of the sort Sir Humphrey would descibe as “courageous”. It means a readiness to accept evidence and act on it. So you can imagine how delighted I am that the the Parliamentary council on science and technology (CST) has kicked off a most excellent enquiry about government use of scientific evidence, based on two out of my three criteria.

NEW INQUIRY

SCIENTIFIC ADVICE, RISK AND EVIDENCE: HOW GOVERNMENT HANDLES THEM


The Science and Technology Committee agreed, at its meeting today, that it would hold an inquiry to examine the way in which the Government obtains and uses scientific advice in the development of policy.

The inquiry will focus upon the mechanisms in place for the use of scientific advice (including the social sciences) and the way in which the guidelines governing the use of such advice is being applied in practice across Government. It will test the extent to which policies are “evidence-based”.

The Committee will carry out this inquiry by addressing the questions below in a series of case studies.

The first three case studies to be addressed are:

1. The technologies supporting the Government’s proposals for identity cards
2. The classification of illegal drugs
3. The use of MRI equipment: the EU Physical Agents (Electromagnetic Fields) Directive

Published by William Heath on 26/01/06 at 12:59pm

Comments

  1. On a (pedantic?) point ... it’s not the CST (http://www.cst.gov.uk) doing this inquiry - it’s the House of Commons Science and Technology Select Committee(http://www.parliament.uk/parliamentary_committees/science_and_technology_committee.cfm).

    Reply by Jerry Fishenden  on  01/27/06  at  5:23 pm

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.

Ideal Government

Let's say what we want from e-enabled government. Let's observe government first-hand. Let's say "Wouldn't It Be Better If" (WIBBI). Become an ethnographer of bureaucracy today! It beats getting frustrated with public services.

Categories

Comment

Anyone is free to comment. Or mail with an article if you want to be an author. I'll post it up and send you a password. This whole thing is supported by Kable.

Authors

Member List

Sign up for new articles

Locations of visitors to this page

Copyright

Creative Commons License - Some Rights Reserved Protect your Bits. Support ORG. Open Rights Group

Designed by...

visit ScoreCommunications Ltd

Statistics

This page has been viewed 590931 times

Entries: 1714 | Comments: 2785 | Trackbacks: 206
Most Recent Entry: 01/02/2009 12:43 pm
Most Recent Comment: 01/02/2009 04:11 pm

Members: 185 | Logged in: 0 | Guests: 26
Most recent visitor: 01/06/2009 10:53 pm
Most visitors ever: 443 on 10/12/2005 02:21 pm