Not Anon here, but Anon’s friend. Thank you for providing this facility.
I recognise quite a few author names from the e-gov circuit. Good to see we all have some life left in us as we tackle the behemoth of e-government.
Two apparently seperate threads sit one above the other.
1. We must take joined up e-government out of the hands of government
2. We want to take e-enabled advice and services to the most needy
From my perspective they are related. Improved service delivery can mean taking it out of the gov’s hands and putting it in the hands of those who can target delivery to the most needy/socially excluded or whatever label they are given.
Whats interesting about the e-Government intermediaries policy, (hinted at but not named in the first topic) is that while its initial adoption would be by those online (the middle market, occaisional irregular use of gov services) its real power to deliver benefits is actually in e-enabling those groups who can work with the digitally-divided. Allowing, say, a particular support group to not just be accredited to government but to be able to act as a full agent who can do more than just distribute a form. Instead, designing a better one, or even plucking answers for the appropriate field from their client records.
This page has been viewed 1392748 times
Entries: 1630 | Comments: 2668 | Trackbacks: 206
Most Recent Entry: 10/13/2008 05:25 pm
Most Recent Comment: 10/13/2008 02:02 pm
Members: 185 | Logged in: 0 | Guests: 32
Most recent visitor: 10/13/2008 07:53 pm
Most visitors ever: 443 on 10/12/2005 02:21 pm