Does the ID system hold risks for honest citizens?

I just got in a paper from Brian Gladman (see below). He fears it may come across too trenchant for us to use and offers to “tone it down” but it strikes me as perfectly reasoned and expressed in measured language. He raises difficult points we need to consider.

On the question of trust over intent, for example, he points to the prior experience with the police and DNA:

a) in 1984 the Police and Criminal Evidence (PACE) Act made it illegal for the police to retain DNA records taken from people who were not subsequently prosecuted or convicted;

b) in 1985 British police started using DNA fingerprinting and gave assurances that samples would be destroyed unless there was a conviction;

c) during the period from 1985 to 2000 the police retained all DNA fingerprint data in clear defiance of PACE; the government was aware that the police were acting illegally

d) in 2001 this government introduced the Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001 which included a clause that authorised and retrospectively legalised 15 years of illegal police activity in retaining the DNA records of people who have not been convicted of any crime.

Dr Gladman goes on to explore the risks to honest citizens:

Once every UK citizen’s fingerprints are recorded on the NIR, the police will be able to make NIR fingerprint searches to identify people. Since most honest, law abiding citizens do not take any special measures to avoid leaving their fingerprints around, the end result of this process could easily be that they will end up with the police on their doorstep asking them to explain how it is that their fingerprints have been found at a crime scene. Moreover, since justice is never perfect, a small proportion will fail to convince the police of their innnocence and will find themselves convicted of a crime which they did not commit.

So, he argues, universal police-accessible fingerprint data leads to a direct risk of interrogation and false conviction. Criminals will find it easier to frame people by planting fingerprints, and access to the national ID register will become the easier option for the police and intelligence services, with greater risk of wrongful convictions. So the UK ID cards bill forces honest UK citizens to provide data to the government that creates a direct risk to their safety.

He then flips the whole thing round to look at the question of the thousands of crimes committed each year by bogus officials - people posing as police officers, council workers etc. Why does the government not mention this ID issue?

It would be a gross injustice if Parliament voted for an ID card system that allowed officials to verify citizens but did not allow citizens to verify the identity or authority of officials.

He wonders if home owners and businesses will be able to purchase biometric verification equipment for use with the NIR, or if the identification system is only available to elite clients who pay large sums for it, while ordinary taxpayers can’t use its services. He’s written to his MP (who probably wonders what has hit him...or perhaps he’s used to these by now).

A more-than-keen mathematician, Dr Gladman’s formula for calculating major government IT project costs is to take the cost at first approval and multiply it by Pi - far less work than what we did, but gives a similar result. That’s experience for you. He did run MoD’s £600m/yr communication projects for eight years. 

 
Page 1 of 1 pages

Ideal Government

Let's say what we want from e-enabled government. Let's observe government first-hand. Let's say "Wouldn't It Be Better If" (WIBBI). Become an ethnographer of bureaucracy today! It beats getting frustrated with public services.

Categories

Comment

Anyone is free to comment. Or mail with an article if you want to be an author. I'll post it up and send you a password. This whole thing is supported by Kable.

Sponsor

Authors with password: click here to post

BLOGS etc
Bruce Schneier
Jeff Jonas, IBM
Jerry Fishenden
Headshift
Ian Brown
Kim Cameron, MS
Matthew Somerville
Public strategist
Richard Allan
Robin Wilton, Sun
Sam Smith
Stefan Brands, Credentica
Toby Stevens, EPG
Whitehall Webby
Will Davies

CRITICAL FRIENDS
Action on Rights for Children
Big Opt-Out
FIPR
Light blue touchpaper
NHS23
No2ID
Perfect e-democracy
Spy blog
Verified Voting

PERTINENT ART
ACLU privacy pizza
Very model of a notional identity
Swizz of the cards
Handelsman: NSA wiretaps
Handelsman: US spying
Wearcam
Googlezon
Three dead trolls
Stefanos Pantagis

ESSENTIALS

Cluetrain Manifesto
RAE Dilemmas of Privacy
NCC Playlist for public services
Sousveillance
Stefan Brands' book summary
Ross Anderson book

Engelbart Mother of all demos
OTHER ID/SECURITY
ID theft spy
Planet Identity
Pledgebank for refuseniks
Home Office ID cards
Credentica
Ann Cavoukian, Ontario


MYSOCIETY & SAM'S STUFF
MySociety/
They work for you
Fax your MP
DirectionlessGov
Comment on This

...and the original
Stand ID card campaign
PUBLIC SERVANT BLOGS
David Milliband
Read my day
Lynne Featherstone MP
David Copperfield - police
Roy Taylor, Kingston
ReadmyDay
Bill Sticker - parking
Ealing Magistrate
Cllr Andrew Brown
Reynolds/Ambulance

MAPS MASHUPS WE LIKED...
Plymouth Schools
Ben's UK speed cameras
5-day weather forecast
House sale prices
g-Traffic info
Place-O-Pedia

For Google maps mashups see
Googlemapsmania blog

ADVISERS, NGOs
Advice now
Advice Services Alliance
Advice UK
Citizens' Advice


Old stuff
RSS in government blog

Authors

Member List

Sign up for new articles

Locations of visitors to this page

Copyright

Creative Commons License - Some Rights Reserved Protect your Bits. Support ORG. Open Rights Group

Designed by...

visit ScoreCommunications Ltd

Statistics

This page has been viewed 1372093 times

Entries: 1622 | Comments: 2660 | Trackbacks: 206
Most Recent Entry: 10/06/2008 10:46 am
Most Recent Comment: 10/06/2008 12:08 pm

Members: 185 | Logged in: 0 | Guests: 52
Most recent visitor: 10/06/2008 03:08 pm
Most visitors ever: 443 on 10/12/2005 02:21 pm